You Should Not Start Your Franchise In Europe Before Knowing These Facts
With
the changing paradigm of the franchise business model in Europe, it
has become very challenging for the entrepreneurs to work on this.
The European Franchisee Attorney is working to find out the
ways it will be going to change. The Internal Market and Consumer
Protection Committee or IMCO has recently published a study on the
challenges and regulatory framework in Europe.
The
study has shown that the regulatory environment of the EU has
impacted the franchise business module. And it reflects different
factors like promotion support or educates the franchise members.
According to the experienced European Franchisee Attorney, they
are working to achieve the full potential of the franchise business
including the following factors:
-
The obligation of the per-franchise disclosure from both the franchisor and franchisee
-
Specialized law for the competition of franchising
-
Clearly defined roles of the national franchisee associations for example BFA (British Franchise Association).
There
are some changes which the European Franchisee Attorney has
advised to consider.
Use
of the Internet: Every European Franchisee Attorney must be
aware of the fact that the franchise does not allow the franchisees
to have their own website. This rule may be indented to prevent any
confusion among the customers. For example, the golf club
manufacturer Ping Europe Limited has clearly denied the proposal of
its distributors of having a website for the product. According to
them every golf club should be ‘fitted’ to the respective
customer to find the perfect match. However, the Competition and
Market Authority has rejected the argument of Ping and quoted that it
is the breach of 1st Chapter of the Competition Act 1998
along with Article 101 of the Treaty On the Functioning of the
European Union.
Franchiser
Discretion: Discretion among franchiser and franchisee is quite
common. And it needs to be sorted before the renewal of the
agreements. When the disagreement arises, the court generally asks to
imply a term that will restrict both the parties exercising the
discretion with the use of different formulas. Along with that, it
discourages to have an oral modification of the agreement.
Comments
Post a Comment